I will break this piece into two parts: (a) Facts which raise questions, and (b) dots which connect.
FACTS
(a) The United Nations Security Council last week passed Resolution 2817 against Iran for bombing its neighbours. Two of Iran’s allies, China and Russia, abstained. Why?
( b) Saudi Arabia, Qatar etc have literally shut down oil production. They have no storage left. Gulf countries have also been bombed. Why they are not making a move against Iran?
(c) The Strait of Hormuz disruption has hit some nations hard: Japan gets its 95% oil supply; China 40%. This oil crisis is said to be the biggest ever. They knew all along war was coming. They didn’t fret then. They are not fretting now. Why?
(d) The new supreme leader of Iran, son of Ayatollah, Mojtaba Khamenei, as per Bloomberg this January, has over $140 million dollars of real estate empire in West, primarily in London and its Crown islands. How come the United Kingdom, which has slapped 550 sanctions over Iran – 550 sanctions!— has let it happen? Is this hurting the Ayatollah theocracy or helping it to flourish?
(e) Muslim Brotherhood’s avowed aim is to create a caliphate, overriding the Arab nations. It was formed in 1922 by five workers of Suez Canal Corporation in which France held 52% and UK 44% share.
Five years earlier, there was this Balfour Declaration by Britain in 1917 which pledged national home for the Jewish people in Palestine. (So junk the idea that it was empathy out of WW2 holocaust that a Jewish state came about. It was a policy made public some three decades ago.)
What were the European interests in creating this classic gang vs counter gang paradigm inside five years (1917-1922)? This radical Islam vs Zionist zealots? One which is intractable and has kept the region in flames post WW2.
(f) For years Israeli prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu transferred hundreds of millions of dollars to Hamas through Qatar. It’s a fact: Hamas was created by Israel. So you have both Iran and Netanyahu, arch-enemies, aligned in helping Hamas. Are religious wars just a shadow?
Factor in this too: Ayatollah Khomenei took centerstage in 1979. Almost immediately, between 1981-1983, Israel supplied $2 billion dollars worth weapons to Islamic theocratic regime of Iran! What interest Israel had in propping up the Iranian regime?
(f) Between his first term and this one, Trump resisted thrice from going to war against Iran. Even when thousands of protestors were being killed this January, Trump held himself back. (His swift bombing last year was meant to de-escalate it.) What changed within a few days?
THE DOTS
Above are troubling facts. It demands a mental reset to the paradigm you have been fed. It must begin with Trump, and the image you have of him.
The image that Trump is stupid, a buffoon in White House; who doesn’t see things through; arrogant, insufferable, abominable.
But why is it that Putin and Xi Jinping, and the Gulf monarchies, are on the same page with Trump. Are they idiots too despite running their countries for decades?
Don’t we know Russia -China are the arch-enemies of the US- are they seeing a new United States emerge under a new president who is different from the preceding ones?
And Trump, a president twice and in politics for 47 years, could truly be this dumb idiot? That our so-called experts have more nuances than these global leaders with their skin in the game?
So Trump is such an idiot that he embarks on a venture which he can’t control, could end his presidency in mid-terms in November; and almost surely would bring in impeachment and prison in its wake.
We are talking about a man who has been hunted for over 10 years by FBI. (Search Arctic Frost on google.) Four of these years were under Biden administration. And if the FBI still couldn’t come up within anything better than the now-debunked Russia election “hoax”, it does suggest that the man is whistling clean.
“I am doing this for the future,” Trump had said within hours of striking Iran on February 28. What if Trump decided it couldn’t wait, midterms notwithstanding. That it was worth risking his entire political capital, even his life.
What’s the future he thinks is in danger?
If I ask you to name three countries which historically have had a dominant view on world, you would say it’s the United States, Russia and the United Kingdom. Any fight between the two, logic suggests, ought to benefit the third.
Let’s scan a few facts to connect the dots.
- Israel permanently draws the United States into ME conflicts;
- ME is a region Russia can’t ignore: Its underbelly through Black Sea is exposed through Middle East;
- ME has the potential to balkanise, break-up Russia;
- So Middle East is this critical that out of existential threat, both the United States and Russia could blow up each other.
- Same is true of Ukraine, a venue which could spark a nuclear war between them.
(Fun Fact 1: While the allies were winning the WW2, in the dying months of 1945, Winston Churchill had alerted British army and put “Operation Unthinkable” in place – a surprise attack on Soviet Union, soon after. This to the ally which was still spilling blood of its millions so that Great Britain, and others of the free world, could live to see another day.
Fun Fact 2: Elliott Roosevelt, son of FDR, mentions in his book “As he Saw it” a showdown between his father and Churchill after WW2 was over: Roosevelt Sr telling the British premier that he has drawn the US in two big wars — but now no more. And Churchill realizing that “to play off the USSR against the US” is now “a dead duck.”)
Geographically, both the United States and Russia are on the periphery of Europe.
Historically, both have benefitted enormously through cooperation.
Both came out of a pioneering, wandering spirit.
Their cooperation tilted the scale of both World Wars.
Their strategic cooperation offers stability – and China would bring in trade on the table.
This is what strong, sovereign nations do — and this is what a globalist alliance like the European Union, where sovereignty is first casualty, doesn’t like.
If you look at the world through its four vectors – United States, Russia, China and European Union (EU) – you would agree the EU is the weakest of them all.
It’s also fundamentally different from the other three: China,Russia and the US are sovereign nations while EU is a globalist, transnational structure.
Trump almost every day underpins his goal of a world’s reset.
He lets know that before Vladimir Zelensky touched down in Washington, Trump has had a two-hour phone call with Putin.
While war with Iran is red-hot, he again has an hour-long word with Putin.
And now that Zelensky has offered his drones to the US, Trump has declared: “Last person we need help from is Zelensky; ”: the man for whom his so-called allies in Europe are pining for.
So now Trump has lifted sanctions off Russia; India has been offered a waiver; and Trump is visiting China next month.
Trump has also baited the United Kingdom by asking them to send warships in Strait of Hormuz in support: But the NATO ally has only responded by saying it’s weighing its options.
Trump has already given interviews on his disappointments with Great Britain which initially refused to let the US use its airbases in Diego Garcia. And when Great Britain did offer help, Trump was biting: “We don’t need people to join Wars after we’ve already won.”
What any other evidence one needs to know that the US and UK, Anglo-saxons and all, are on a collision course. The two which are joined at the hips. Why our experts are skirting this, possibly the greatest reset of the world since WW2?
Remember Trump didn’t inform or involve Europe at the outbreak of this war; NATO is still cooling its heels.
Trump has always tried to break-free of this globalists chokehold.
He left JCPOA in his first term;
He pulled out of Paris climate accord which he feels is a globalists’ transnational agenda;
He has dumped 66 transnational bodies; created a different matrix of “Board of Peace” etc;
All of it points towards a global reset he thinks is necessary to get rid of permanent wars in the world, those of globalists who create and use transnational bodies to make sovereign nations helpless.
Time To End It
Trump wants to take this Israel-Iran paradigm off the Middle East chessboard.
It has kept the world hostage for decades.
Israel, now that its ascendant in the Middle East and everyone is weaker, wants to go berserk.
The first comment of secretary of state Marco Rubio was that the US joined the war because Israel was about to strike Iran.
That is, the United States joined to prevent Israel from going berserk, and as some reports have suggested, Israel could’ve even used a nuclear bomb on Iran.
When Israel attacked Iran’s oil refineries, the United States publicly rebuked them (WTF: What the fxxk).
Next logical question is: What stops Trump from pulling out if he is a peace and not a war-beast? Well, for the same reason that Israel and its masters don’t go out of hand.
It makes us confront another question: Why then Trump is not punishing Israel?
Answer: Why do you think Trump is silent while Iran is pounding Tel Aviv???
What Trump is doing in the Middle East, risking everything he has, is chaotic, violent and destructive.
But you’ve got to do what you need to do to build anything durable.
Just kicking the can down the road isn’t getting rid of it.
This Israel-Iran, Jews-Islam playbook is a deep, dark tunnel without a light in the end.
Trump is trying to end it and expose the Great Game of over a century.
This was necessary if our children, the next generation, are to be freed from this cancer.
Anyone who controls the oil from the Middle East, and its sea lanes, would control the world.
It’s up to you to decide if Trump is your best bet — or the current globalists’ hold whose mask is slipping.
